Virginia Greaves

The Use of Someone Else’s Photograph in Your Work

Worry

Worry has been quite the topic of conversation today. The QuiltArt List (an online email list for quilters) has been abuzz since someone brought up the subject of this piece at IQF-Houston — and not in a good way.

Many people are familiar with Dorothea Lange’s iconic photograph from the Great Depression — titled Migrant Mother — from which this piece is inspired. The original poster thought that I had merely printed the picture onto fabric and then thread painted it — therefore saying that it was a gross violation of Dorothea Lange’s copyright.

Well obviously Dorothea Lange’s photograph is in black and white and this is not. My piece is all machine appliquéd from commercial fabrics. It is NOT a colorized version of her photograph that was printed onto one sheet of fabric.

Also, I am clear that this is inspired by Dorothea Lange’s photograph, and if you look it up, you will find that — however famous the photograph is — it is in the public domain and therefore free of copyrights.

I also assure that there was extensive drawing from the original photograph to create this pattern. I make a value painting of all of my pieces that start from a photograph, but photographs rarely ever tell you everything you need to know. There are many details that photographs don’t tell you — like fingers and eyes — and many shadows have to be deepened and highlights have to be brought out. You can obviously and easily posterize any picture in Photoshop, but these patterns will never have the level of detail for which I strive.

Furthermore, since it’s a black and white photograph, the color story is entirely mine.

You can make an argument regarding composition. I understand that. In using Dorothea Lange’s photograph, I used her composition. I did not violate her copyright nor did I break any of the rules of the competitions in which she has been entered.

It’s a decision. A couple of years ago, I researched how to make my work more marketable. One way to do that is to use historical figures as subjects. This means using someone else’s composition — essentially. I don’t always do this, but sometimes I do.

There are people that don’t agree that this should be viewed as art.

It’s interesting. I only find this discussion among quilters. I hung this piece in an art exhibit back in May. Everyone knows its inspiration is a well-known photograph — and no comment was made about whether or not it was art. It was not brought into question whether or not it was eligible for a ribbon. I am sharing this merely to contrast the differences between the two communities.

Is it art? Have I created something that hearkens back to the story Dorothea Lange created — and yet made it my own, using my own medium? Does anyone see the modern era mother who has the same stress as the mother from the Great Depression about caring for her children in times of economic hardship?  I suppose the answer will be a personal one to everyone reading this.

Comments

8 responses to “The Use of Someone Else’s Photograph in Your Work”

  1. Ben Hollingsworth Avatar

    It is called ‘derivative’ art and it is readily accepted by the artist community. The best examples I can think of is Andy Warhol. His soup cans are reproductions of the Campbell’s soup can label. Marilyn Monroe, Elvis, Jackie Kennedy, Chairman Mao… on and on. And how many times have you seen a variation on American Gothic, Starry, Starry Night, Mona Lisa and the Scream?

    As a former public school art teacher we frequently dealt with the issue of copyright and what limitations there are. Using photographs is the starting point for many artist.

    The primary rule that I use is that if your work attempts to deceive someone into believing that the work is the original then that is wrong. In the legal world it’s called Fair Use.

  2. Ben Hollingsworth Avatar

    Oh, what about Ted Turner’s colorized classic movies?

  3. Rebecca Edwards Avatar
    Rebecca Edwards

    My Mighty Women series used a photo of my subject as the base. Days of photoshop work and artistic interpretation are spent on each photo.

    Your work also used photographs as inspiration and weeks and months are spent bringing those photographs to life.

    The art community recognizes this as art.

    Quilter-artist-wanna-bes with no formal art training and an occasional workshop where they learn and copy other artistic styles are not a group who’s opinion I would consider.

    Your work is stellar. There is a reason it wins at the IQF and in art galleries.

    Keep on creating my dear. I can’t wait to see your next work.

  4. Madeline Hawley Avatar
    Madeline Hawley

    The original photograph has been used in many ways, but this one, done in fabric,and intricately constructed, not to mention color, is recognizable as derivative only by the pose of the mother with her children. There was never a copyright on this particular photo. I think it well deserved an award. It is beautiful.

  5. Karen Cunagin Avatar

    Beautiful work.
    Wonderful commentary.
    Blessings…

  6. Shelagh Avatar
    Shelagh

    Amen. Your work is spectacular. It is sublime, moving, magnificent art. Thanks you for sharing your talents with all of us. You are making the world a richer, more beautiful place.

  7. Rebecca Avatar
    Rebecca

    Ginny,

    Days ago when I peeked at QuiltArt to read what folks were saying about Worry I didn’t recognize any names and made my comment about artists wanna bes. I see I am wrong in that there many high profile artists joining in.

    What I am so sad about is the meanness and cutting edge to their commentary. I don’t know if any of them have actually SEEN your work in person to appreciate the beauty and quality of execution. Or if they have looked a any of your other work.

    I remember the days when some of these artists would appreciate the value of execution. If they do not like your subject, then they should suggest you select something different.

    And I am astounded to read how many think portraiture is copying photos. I have so many friends who are doing portraiture — Jenny Hansen is booked for 14 months and had to tell her agent to quit accepting contracts. Jenny, after all these years, is excited by every new face, and capturing the emotion and essence of personality if each subject. With an MFA from Ringling she is most certainly an artist. And she looks at AMAZEMENT and APPRECIATION at the work of abstract artists. I am disappointed in the tone of those artists on QuiltArt.

    As women we should be holding each other up to achieve great heights and not tear each other down.

    Now I will return to my world of art, surrounded by artists who encourage and lift each other up, and appreciate the different styles and mediums with which we create.

    And keep on keeping on Ginny. Your introspection, meticulous consideration of each mark you make, superb execution, appreciation for all styles of art and gentle and kind soul make you the clear winner.

  8. […] was viewed 21,00 times in 2014 which broke all of my previous records. The highest viewed post was The Use of Someone Else’s Photograph in Your Work, the subject of which was the controversy over my piece Worry at the International Quilt […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *