Admin

Quilters have an intimate relationship with their sewing machine. They learn what it needs and how to use it to create amazing works of art. Many quilters are experienced in using their machine to free motion quilt, use difficult metallic threads, and play with tension. Every machine is different, and knowing your machine and what it needs to do something amazing is part of the talent of each quilter.

A couple of years ago — 6 1/2 to be precise — my husband bought me my dream machine. A top of the line Viking — a Designer I. I had been sewing for a year on a Lilly — which I traded in — and I was ready to do more. It has embroidery capabilities and hundreds of stitches. I knew that it was a machine built to last because it was made by Husqvarna Viking. There was no point in considering a low end machine with plastic parts that would just break in a couple of years. Husqvarna Viking has a reputation for high quality products. Besides, I was given a 20 year warranty on the machine. What a wonderful investment.

Do I sound bitter? I’m getting rid of the last of it — bear with me. Because it isn’t a dream machine. After less than 7 years, the sensor on the motor head is breaking down. Because it is an electrical problem, it only has a 5 yr warranty — and thus is no longer covered. The repair costs $1,000. Right.

When I asked the repairman what caused this problem — he said that it was just age. It is like a computer that isn’t designed to last more than 5 years.

So I bought a 5 year machine. It isn’t a total paperweight — yet — so I suppose from their point of view, I’m lucky.

The new top of the line Viking is $9,000. The top of the line Bernina is $12,000. I thought that the sewing machine dealers were starting to listen to us — but I was wrong. At this point, they are catering to embroiderers that buy patterns to put on towels, clothes, burp cloths, etc. Interestingly, when the local Viking dealer told me the cost of the new machine & I gasped, she said that I needed to look at it like a car that only costs $200 a month. I would be very surprised if most home sewers are willing to equate their sewing machine with the expense of a car. The reason that longarm machines cost so much is that the buyers inevitably start a commercial business quilting for other people.

So rather than be negative, I think that there is a better way that I can spend $1,000. Interestingly, at this point in my quilting career, I don’t know if there is a dream machine, though. I would like a great straight stitch, at least a 9 harp (although more is always better), and a zigzag for machine applique. I used to love the sensor lift system on the Viking — no presser foot lever to constantly flip up & down — but it’s the electronics that won’t last over time.

I suppose even if I spend my $1,000 (and a little more) on something like the Janome 6600, the 5 yr limit on electronics (they have this limit too) won’t seem as bad as if I had spent $9,000.

I would love a long arm too (I even have a frame waiting for one)– but I still have to have something to piece & applique with.

My machine has been gone almost three weeks and I’m expecting it home on Friday. I think that it will be difficult for us to work together. “The thrill is gone baby.”

A week or so ago, there was a large discussion on QuiltArt.com about copyright. Congress is debating the Orphan Works bill (there is an excellent article on this subject here) and the subject of Flickr.com came up. Someone mentioned that they had found their work on Flickr posted by someone else and were upset that anyone logging on could use their image to put on coffee mugs. In the back of my mind, I remembered Gloria Hansen discussing how she had found an image of her work on Cafepress.com and that it was being used on lots of merchandise.

So on a lark, I went to Flickr, which I didn’t know much about, and typed “quilts” into the search engine. There were so many — so I typed in “quilts Greaves”. Holy Cannoli — there were my quilts that have been in the International Quilt Festival in Houston the last couple of years, some posted more than once.

When I started looking at the pages, there were copyrights on my quilts granted to the poster. I was stunned. In looking further, I found that Flickr automatically gives an “all rights reserved” copyright to people that post to their servers. (This can be changed to different degrees of copyright, but really none would apply in this situation.)

Their help files indicate that it is possible for the image poster to restrict downloads on an image, but there is no way to see download restrictions on an image page.  To the casual observer, anyone could use the image on any Flickr products. (Which is interesting — one woman wrote me that she had put download restrictions on the images of my work — and my mom pointed out the irony that I couldn’t have made myself a coffee mug with an image of my own work.)

Flickr appears to be a community photo album — but there are people using it for sharing their experiences at exhibitions — which would be personal use and no problem (for me anyway) if Flickr did not presume the poster to be the sole copyright holder and automatically grant them an “all rights reserved” copyright on their images (of other people’s work).

This has been hard for me because I am flattered when someone likes my work enough to take a picture and share it with others. I believe that personal use of images is a good thing and that including images on blogs and other photo album sites is great when full attribution is given.

Someone on quiltart pointed out, however, they we do not have a working definition of “personal use” when it comes to copyright. And strictly speaking, copyright is either authorized or not — there is no room under the current rules for anyone to copy a piece of artwork unless authorized or otherwise not covered under the existing law.

Of course, Flickr’s reaction was to notify each poster of my work that they were being given “NOI’s” (notice of infringement) on their account and that more violations would result in termination of their accounts.

I am saddened by this entire thing. I have had very upset emails from the posters — who I honestly do NOT think realized that Flickr was giving them copyrights on my work — and all they want is to have continued access to their pictures. I wish that they would consider another photo album service — and have told them so — but in the end, it is easier to stick with what you know. (And sadly, from a legal sense, although their intentions were good, they did indeed violate my copyrights by not asking for my permission.)

And following the easy way is why there is apathy about the Orphan Works bill. No-one wants to think about how it is going to affect them. Actually, I would hazard to say that apathy is strong nowadays about a lot of things. My family had to face this same issue when we left — hmmm, let’s just say a mainstream church denomination. Everyone in our local church agreed with us, but no-one was willing to do anything about it. The minority has taken over. Political correctness has overcome our ability to defend our positions. We think that as long as we believe what we do that the others can’t really affect us. That is wrong.

I have been working on my piece in Photoshop and couldn’t figure out why it didn’t look right. Well, of course it was the eyes. I also changed the shading around the mouth. I think that the upward shadow is misleading. I had the same issue on my last portrait.